LEVER

How To Build a Personal Brand Ecosystem That Sells

How To Build a Personal Brand Ecosystem That Sells

Nader Alnajjar

TLDR

  • Engagement without leads almost always means one missing piece: knowing where each post sits in your content funnel.

  • A complete strategy needs all three parts. TOF attracts new eyes, MOF builds authority, and BOF turns attention into leads. Most people only post TOF because likes feel good.

  • David Manela went from positioning too broad to a single resonant insight (only 50% of CMOs sit in on strategy meetings), then built an entire pillar, plus TOF and BOF, around CMO and board alignment.

  • A single post does not need to do everything. TOF gets attention, MOF builds trust, BOF converts, but only when all three work together.

You're posting consistently, getting engagement, but still not seeing leads. I can almost guarantee this is your missing piece:

Understanding where each post fits in your content funnel.

Let's break it down.

Build Leverage By Learning:

  • Why You Need All Three Parts of the Funnel

  • Finding What Works

Why You Need All Three Parts of the Funnel

A complete content strategy requires three types of posts:

  • Top of Funnel (TOF): Broad, relatable content that attracts new eyes. Viral moments, controversial takes, universally resonant insights.

  • Middle of Funnel (MOF): Educational content that builds authority. Frameworks, breakdowns, actionable advice that proves you know your stuff.

  • Bottom of Funnel (BOF): Conversion-focused content that drives action. Lead magnets, case studies, specific offers that turn followers into leads.

The vast majority of people only focus on TOF because it feels good to get likes. But if you're not driving that attention anywhere for people to take action, then you're just wasting your time.

Let's break down a real example of someone who struggled at first but eventually found a winning content strategy.

Finding What Works: David Manela Case Study

When David first started posting content, his positioning was too broad; it was centred around the idea of "building at the intersection of growth and data", but this was way too vague.

For months, he experimented. Nothing stuck. The content would get views, but no engagement. Let alone any leads or conversions.

Then he posted something different:

An MOF post based on the idea that "Only 50% of CMOs sit in on strategy meetings".

This idea got a lot of engagement and traction. CMOs were commenting, sharing frustrations, tagging their CEOs. The message seemed to really resonate. And a lot of the post's success also came down to how it was constructed:

  • The hook instantly draws the reader in through a statistic (including the source of the stat is also a good way to build authority).

  • The pain points are very clearly outlined in the first three bullet points.

  • Very specific value is provided in the lessons.

Most people would've ridden that moment of success and moved on.

But David leaned into it for the rest of his MOF content, turning that insight into an entire content pillar.

These posts took the pain point of CMOs feeling misaligned with their board that clearly resonated with David's ICP, and combined it with pre-validated formats (cartoon images, "Anatomy of X", cross-and-tick sheet structures). This helped make quite dense and niche content more digestible for a LinkedIn audience, while still delivering framework-based value.

The revelation of this pain point was now a great jumping-off point for ideating any TOF and BOF pieces.

David's Top-of-Funnel Content

One post takes a pre-validated "meme" format and adapts it to suit David's audience. The caption is structured in a way that's very typical of top-of-funnel posts:

  • The first line of the hook is broad and assertive (classic TOF hook format), while the second line taps into David's niche.

  • The structure is simple but clear: bold hook, brief setup, list of actionable value, power ending.

  • Another post uses a viral quote by Peter Drucker (another very pre-validated format on LinkedIn) to draw in the most amount of people possible, then gives more of David's personal perspective in the caption.

The main thing to take away here is that viral content doesn't need to be "cringe" or "shallow". Use formats that work as the vessel for your own ideas and perspectives; it's all about packaging a complex idea in the most accessible way possible.

David's Bottom-of-Funnel Content and Converting Attention

The same principle of building on this resonant pain point applied to David's BOF content too.

David first built a lead magnet landing page for CMOs struggling with board alignment, a slide deck framework to translate marketing results into the language CEOs and boards care about.

Then he created BOF posts to drive traffic to it.

The caption works well for a BOF post because:

  • The hook is personalised (first person) and directly draws on David's experience to establish authority and give people a reason to read on.

  • The setup addresses the common challenge or pain point his ICP relates to.

  • It directly shows the value of the lead magnet by outlining the transformation it can provide.

  • The CTA gives readers a clear next step, while also qualifying prospects by making them go through the effort of commenting to receive the lead magnet.

David's strategy now operates as an ecosystem:

  • TOF posts bring new people in and signal broad expertise.

  • MOF posts build authority and keep the audience engaged over time.

  • BOF posts turn that attention into business opportunities.

The key thing to remember here is: a singular post doesn't need to do everything. TOF gets attention. MOF builds trust. BOF converts. But you need all three working together.

What This Means For You

If your content isn't converting, ask:

  • Are you only posting TOF and wondering why no one buys?

  • Do you have MOF that educates but never asks for the sale?

  • Are you pushing BOF offers to an audience that doesn't trust you yet?

Find your unique positioning. Double down with educational content. Create clear conversion points that flow naturally from what you've taught.

That's how you turn a content strategy into a client acquisition system.

If you are a founder, the reason engagement is not turning into leads is rarely the quality of any single post. It is the absence of a funnel underneath them. TOF, MOF and BOF are three different jobs, and a feed that only ever reaches for likes is doing the first job well and the other two not at all. Attention with nowhere to go is, as Nader puts it, just wasted time.

The practical lesson from David Manela is to find the one pain point your buyers genuinely feel, then build outward from it. He did not chase a wider audience, he went narrower and sharper, turned a single resonant insight about CMO and board alignment into a whole MOF pillar, then wrapped TOF posts around it for reach and BOF posts around it for conversion. Do the same with your positioning: get specific about the problem you solve, educate relentlessly, and create clear conversion points that flow naturally from what you have taught.

Related Reads

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does my content get engagement but no leads?

Almost always because the missing piece is funnel structure: knowing where each post sits. A complete strategy needs top-of-funnel content to attract new eyes, middle-of-funnel content to build authority, and bottom-of-funnel content to drive action. If you only post TOF because likes feel good, you generate attention with nowhere for people to act on it, which is wasted effort.

What is the difference between TOF, MOF and BOF content?

Top of funnel is broad, relatable content that attracts new eyes, such as viral moments and universally resonant insights. Middle of funnel is educational content that builds authority, like frameworks and breakdowns that prove you know your stuff. Bottom of funnel is conversion-focused content that drives action, including lead magnets, case studies and specific offers that turn followers into leads.

What can founders learn from the David Manela case study?

That specificity beats breadth. David's early positioning, building at the intersection of growth and data, was too vague and nothing stuck. A single MOF post about only 50% of CMOs sitting in on strategy meetings resonated hard, and instead of moving on he turned that pain point into an entire content pillar, then built TOF posts for reach and a BOF lead-magnet funnel for conversion around the same insight.

Does every post need to do everything?

No. A single post should not try to attract, educate and convert all at once. TOF gets attention, MOF builds trust, and BOF converts, and each is measured differently. The goal is not one perfect post, it is all three types working together as an ecosystem so attention has somewhere to flow and a clear path to becoming a lead.

Ready to Turn Content Into a Client System?

You have the ideas and the audience. What is missing is the ecosystem that turns attention into leads. LeverBrands builds the full top, middle and bottom of funnel system for founders and executives, so your content stops collecting likes and starts booking calls. Get in touch and we will map your funnel.

About the author. Nader Alnajjar is co-founder of LeverBrands, where he builds personal brands and content ecosystems for founders and executives. More at leverbrands.com/about and on LinkedIn.

Red Gradient background
Green Gradient background
Green Gradient background
Red Gradient background
Red Gradient background
Green Gradient background
Green Gradient background
Red Gradient background
Red Gradient background
Green Gradient background
Green Gradient background
Red Gradient background

LEVER

white LinkedIn icon

Lever © 2024 All Rights Reserved

LEVERAGE

LEVER

white LinkedIn icon

Lever © 2024 All Rights Reserved

LEVERAGE

LEVER

white LinkedIn icon

Lever © 2024 All Rights Reserved

LEVERAGE